biomimicron

The book of the mimicry of the living

Biomythology: Eastgate-gate 1 (or How the Eastgate Centre, Harare, is not like a termite mound)

18 Comments

The Eastgate Centre, Harare, Zimbabwe, is a very famous building to environmental construction. Designed by Mick Pearce in conjunction with ARUP, the mixed office complex and shopping mall utilises thermal mass and a specific air change schedule, using high rates of mechanical night cooling, supplemented by smaller rates of passive ventilation during the day to keep air fresh and at the correct temperature. In addition fan power requirements are reduced by stack effect ventilation through the building, and the buoyancy effect generated by the occupants’ metabolic activities. The ventilation costs one tenth of that of a comparable building, saving $3.5 million in energy costs in the first 5 years.

estgate exterior

What follows is a reworking of part my dissertation. Plagiarism is not encouraged. This work is protected through creative commons licences. The suggested academic reference is:

Parr,D., 2012, Biomimicry Lessons for Building Ventilation, Submitted for qualification of Environmental Design of Buildings MSc, at Cardiff University – Welsh School of Architecture. Treatment available at biomimicron.wordpress.com

UPDATE 23/04/2013: Since this set of articles was published, I have had the good fortune to get to talk to both Rupert Soar and Mick Pearce extensively about their work, and recieved information from Dan Phillips. In being able to get EVEN MORE information from all these people, I now feel that this series of articles is still only part of the discussion. There is nothing in these articles which is outright untrue, however they miss a significant proportion of Mick, Dan and Arups good work. Look out for Eastgate Now: Redux coming soon…

This is all very good design, which Pearce should rightly be very proud of. He uses building science and knowledge of the building function and occupant activity to create a thermally comfortable space with understanding of the local climate, using very little energy. He credits inspiration for this building to the termite mounds all across this region of Africa. The termites utilise wind driven and thermosiphon flow powered by the termites own bodies to accelerate ventilation through the nest. These methods lead to an extremely stable nest temperature, never varying more than 1 oC.

eastgate schematic

Pearce’s structure is built around a central chimney, with the hot air generated by his occupants being naturally drawn through convection out of the chimney, and the radiant heat being transmitted into the thermal mass, which further enhances the convection. At night electrical fans suck in cold air, which passes through the building, cooling the thermal mass and expelling heat out of the chimney again. The termites techniques have been clearly applied to the form of this building leading to reduced reliance on external power generation and so less external energy consumption from the wider national grid. The use of stack ventilation, electrical fans, thermal mass and buoyant air all mimic the processes of a termite nest.

In nature termites obviously don’t have a ‘power grid’ though and so bridge this energy deficit through micro-generation strategies. The fungus combs they cultivate are harvested locally, and transported to the base of the nest. Here a ‘delta primitive’ cast, subservient to the blue skinned Kree, load the terrigen crystals into the Nega-bomb enabling a  Cthulu Universe to enter through the tear in space and….

This picture is satirical

This picture is satirical

Wait a second. That’s the plot of Realm of Kings. Termites don’t have a method to ‘make up the deficit’ and power tiny fans, so what IS going on here?

1)    Termites have entirely passive structure

2)    Man makes building inspired by science based on termite nests

3)    Man’s building requires extra energy to function

Therefore there are two opportunities for a mistake here. Either:

a)    Man has misapplied correct science

b)    Man has applied incorrect science

The Inhabitat link above has got so much wrong (I’ve noticed Jill Fehrenbacher’s work is particularly prone to bad science) but they are by NO MEANS the only ones. Stick your guess as to which mistake, a) or b) it is in the comments. Part 2 next…
Creative Commons Licence
Biomythology: Eastgate-gate (or How the Eastgate Centre, Harare, is not like a termite mound) by Biomimicron: Parr, D is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

 

Author: DaveParr

Data Science, Environmental Science, Making and Music

18 thoughts on “Biomythology: Eastgate-gate 1 (or How the Eastgate Centre, Harare, is not like a termite mound)

  1. Termites need ultra high humidity and don’t care for windows, so I guess the metaphor is stretched to start with.

  2. Pingback: Biomythology: Eastgate-gate 2 (or How the Eastgate Centre, Harare, is not like a termite mound) « biomimicron

  3. I think you are taking the concept of biomimicry as applied to architecture a little too literally. One takes inspiration from nature, one rarely tries to reproduce it. We simply don’t understand most things well enough to transplant them completely, even if they are a Real Thing. Every creature on Earth is capable of creating substances and objects which are still irreproducible by human machines. We just borrow a trick, or even just a concept, where they can help. Complaining that the building uses energy inputs to circulate air is a very strange criticism, unless the strategy *does not save energy over traditional designs*!

    • Hi ‘Redditor’,
      Firstly, and this is my fault, I had an exam to take this week, and have yet to finish this article fully. The third part will be a far more constructive piece, suggesting a more accurate, productive way of using termite mound inspiration.
      As for taking biomimetic architecture too literally, it is my view that biomimetic design, in any field, should be taken as literally as possible, and your next sentence almost argues my point; “still irreproducible by human machines”. That’s sort of the point. They are for now, but if we don’t push our capabilities and targets, they will remain so. Obviously we just borrow ‘tricks’ at the moment, but in reference to the Eastgate centre, I have two axes to grind:
      1) the 1 degC myth, which is the topic of the second post. This is just straight up misinterpretation of nature, and as the as yet unwritten third post (sorry again) will go on to say: A better understanding will lead to a better building
      2) The use of bouyant air and stack effect is not even really biomimicry. This is a well known technique for building ventilation that has been used for years. Will the specifics escape me I am sure there are ancient buildings in the Middle East which have used the same processes. Biomimicry is innovation through nature, by definition. If it already exists, it’s poor sport ot call it ‘biomimetic’.
      Still these views are all ‘IMHO’, and thanks for your feedback, this is the first developed comment/criticisim this blog has recieved, and it is genuinely appreciated 🙂 As such I think it deserves a pop culture reference in true biomimicron style: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZikWfrGG9kU

  4. Pingback: Biomythology: Eastgate-gate 2 (or How the Eastgate Centre, Harare, is not like a termite mound) « biomimicron

  5. Pingback: What Biomimicry needs to learn from the internet and Aaron Swartz: 1 – Nerdcore Hiphop « biomimicron

  6. Pingback: A satistical analysis of Hassani’s Mine Kafon « biomimicron

  7. Pingback: “iGeneration for Dummies” or 5 Things I learned on the internet | biomimicron

  8. Pingback: “iGeneration for Dummies” or 5 Things I learned on the internet | The Biomimicron

  9. Pingback: “So Long, and Thanks for all the Clicks” or 5 indescribable moments in 5 months | The Biomimicron

  10. Pingback: Ecobuild Day 1: Good design and great people | The Biomimicron

  11. Pingback: Biomythology: Eastgate-gate 3 (or How the Eastgate Centre, Harare, is not like a termite mound) | The Biomimicron

  12. Pingback: A statistical analysis of Hassani’s Mine Kafon | The Biomimicron

  13. Pingback: What Biomimicry needs to learn from the internet and Aaron Swartz: 1 – Nerdcore Hiphop | The Biomimicron

  14. Pingback: Biomythology: Eastgate-gate 2 (or How the Eastgate Centre, Harare, is not like a termite mound) | The Biomimicron

  15. Pingback: A statistical analysis of Hassani’s Mine Kafon | The Biomimicron

  16. Pingback: Biomythology: Eastgate-gate 3 (or How the Eastgate Centre, Harare, is not like a termite mound) | The Biomimicron

  17. Pingback: Biomythology: Eastgate-gate 2 (or How the Eastgate Centre, Harare, is not like a termite mound) | The Biomimicron

Leave a comment